Important clarification regarding Juso inheritance tax initiative

The Young Socialists party has submitted an initiative to introduce a Federal inheritance tax. The initiative will be put to the vote in 2026 at the earliest. The tax demanded by the initiators is an inheritance tax of 50%, with a tax-free amount of CHF 50 million being applied. The tax revenue would have to be used to combat the climate crisis.

Although polls show that the chances of the initiative being accepted are negligible, it has caused a certain amount of uncertainty among the taxpayers concerned. The reason for this is the measures demanded by the initiators to prevent tax avoidance through relocation.

In interpellation 24.3763 submitted on June 14, 2024, National Councillor Schneeberger called on the Federal Council to clarify which specific measures are being considered to prevent tax avoidance in order to quickly clarify the potential implementation of the initiative.

In its response published today, the Federal Council states that it considers the retroactive taxation of estates and gifts demanded by the initiators to be highly problematic in terms of Government policy. It also makes it clear that it will comment in detail on the interpretation of the popular initiative and its possible implementation in the event of its adoption in the dispatch by the beginning of February 2025 at the latest.

The Federal Council has now already announced that the implementation must in any case comply with international law and the Constitution. An exit tax is therefore out of the question. The relocation of a person abroad cannot simply be qualified as tax avoidance and sanctioned with tax consequences. At best, a retroactive right of taxation would be conceivable in the case of a gift made shortly after moving away. However, the Federal Council emphasizes that Switzerland would not be able to enforce such taxation abroad.

The Federal Council also states that the introduction of tax avoidance measures must always comply with constitutional and international law requirements and, in particular, the principle of proportionality.
According to the Federal Council, it is also questionable whether a retroactive entry into force of the inheritance and gift tax would also apply to the required measures for tax avoidance if the initiative was accepted.

The Federal Council’s response makes it clear that a precautionary departure from Switzerland before the day of the vote is not necessary. Even in the unlikely event that the initiative was accepted, it would still be possible to leave Switzerland after the day of the vote without incurring the inheritance tax demanded by the Juso.

With its response to the Schneeberger interpellation, the Federal Council has provided clarity on this issue, which is extremely gratifying. It has thus sent an unmistakable signal that it is not necessary to leave Switzerland before the voting day.

In view of the Federal Council’s clear response, we do not consider it necessary for taxpayers to plan to leave Switzerland at this stage. According to current polls, the initiative has no chance. If, contrary to expectations, the initiative was accepted, it would still be possible to leave Switzerland after the day of the vote without any negative tax consequences. However, we recommend reviewing the situation again in February after publication of the message.