<h3>The Swiss Federal Tribunal rules on the applicability of the Lugano Convention in Swiss enforcement proceedings</h3>
In a decision published on July 28, 2021 (<a href="https://www.bger.ch/ext/eurospider/live/de/php/aza/http/index.php?highlight_docid=aza%3A%2F%2Faza://22-03-2021-5A_697-2020&amp;lang=de&amp;zoom=&amp;type=show_document">DFT 5A_697/2020</a> dated March 22, 2021), the Swiss Federal Tribunal partially clarified the applicability of the Lugano Convention on Jurisdiction and the Recognition and Enforcement of Judgments in enforcement proceedings in Switzerland after Brexit. The decision was marked as a leading case.
<h4>The key take aways and open issues</h4>
<ul>
<li>The Lugano Convention continues to apply in Swiss enforcement proceedings concerning UK judgments rendered pre-Brexit (January 31, 2020) if – at the same time – the enforcement proceedings were completed on the cantonal level before the end of the Brexit transitional period on December 31, 2020 (the Transition Period).</li>
<li>The Lugano Convention very likely continues to apply if the judgment was rendered in the UK during the Transition Period and/or the recognition/enforcement proceedings were initiated but not completed on the cantonal level in Switzerland before the end of the Transition Period.</li>
<li>It is doubtful whether the Lugano Convention continues to apply if the judgment was rendered in the UK before January 1, 2021 but the recognition/enforcement proceedings in Switzerland were initiated after December 31, 2020.</li>
<li>It is rather unlikely that the Lugano Convention continues to govern the recognition of UK judgments rendered after 2020, even if the UK proceedings have been pending since before January 1, 2021.</li>
</ul>
<h4>In a nutshell, the particulars of the case were as follows</h4>
In a decision dated October 17, 2019, the High Court of Justice in England ordered a debtor to pay GBP 8 million plus interest to its creditors (the Order).
In November 2019, the creditors initiated enforcement proceedings against the debtor and requested the attachment of certain of the debtor&#8217;s assets in Switzerland. The creditors sought recognition and enforcement of the Order in Switzerland pursuant to the Lugano Convention.
In December 2019, the Swiss district court granted the creditors&#8217; request ex parte and ordered the attachment of assets of the debtor based on the Order. After hearing the debtor, the district court confirmed the attachment. In July 2020, following an appeal by the debtor, the second instance cantonal court confirmed the lower court&#8217;s decision.
Finally, the debtor filed an appeal with the Swiss Federal Tribunal, arguing – inter alia – that the Lugano Convention no longer applied because of Brexit (as of February 2020) and the end of the Transition Period (December 31, 2020), which concluded while the case was pending before the Federal Tribunal. The debtor argued that, consequently, the (stricter) requirements of the Swiss International Private Law Act (PILA) applied.
<h4>The Federal Tribunal&#8217;s decision</h4>
First, the Federal Tribunal noted that the EU is a contracting state of the Lugano Convention and that, although the UK left the EU on January 31, 2020, it continued to be treated as a member state of the EU during the Transition Period, i.e. until December 31, 2020.
The Federal Tribunal also noted that the lower courts entered their judgments before the end of the Transition Period and, therefore, correctly applied the Lugano Convention.
Second, the Federal Tribunal assessed the consequences of the end of the Transitional Period in light of the pending appeal proceeding before the Federal Tribunal.
The Federal Tribunal held that from January 1, 2021, the Lugano Convention no longer applies to the UK. The Federal Tribunal emphasized that the Lugano Convention neither provides for an express regulation addressing the situation in which a member state ceases to be bound by the Lugano Convention nor does the Lugano Convention provide for a transitional regulation.
The Federal Tribunal referred to the views of various commentators on the subject, which support the view that the recognition and enforcement of judgments rendered during the term of the Lugano Convention should, in principle, continue to be governed by the Lugano Convention. In addition, the Federal Tribunal referred to the opinion of the <a href="https://www.bj.admin.ch/bj/en/home/wirtschaft/privatrecht/lugue-2007/brexit-auswirkungen.html">Swiss Federal Office of Justice</a>, which generally suggests that the recognition and enforcement of judgments rendered in the UK before January 1, 2021, remain subject to the Lugano Convention, even after December 31, 2020.
The Federal Tribunal did not expressly confirm these views, but simply noted that the Order as well as the entire cantonal enforcement proceedings and the filing of the appeal against the decision of the court of second instance took place before the end of the Transition Period. Further, the Tribunal emphasized that it is not clear what major public interest could justify the application of the PILA instead of the Lugano Convention. Furthermore, the Federal Tribunal underscored the principle of non-retroactivity, which courts must consider when interpreting the scope of application of the PILA, and the Federal Tribunal explained that, in certain cases, the new law, if stricter than the old one, might be inapplicable.
Accordingly, the Federal Tribunal held that the present case remains to be subject to the Lugano Convention.
<h4>Discussion</h4>
The Federal Tribunal&#8217;s recent judgment partly clarifies the application of the Lugano Convention after Brexit. In its judgment, the Federal Tribunal carefully avoided any obiter dictum, deciding only the narrow case before it. It did so only with short and strikingly vague arguments that are difficult to extrapolate to other fact patterns. The Federal Tribunal thus retained full freedom to decide other cases as it sees fit if and when they arise. In particular, the Federal Tribunal did not expressly confirm that the Lugano Convention generally continues to apply to all decisions rendered in the UK before the end of the Transition Period and irrespective of when the enforcement proceedings are initiated in Switzerland.
Moreover, the Federal Tribunal did not address the opinion expressed by some commentators that the Lugano Convention continues to govern the recognition of judgments rendered in the UK after 2020, provided that the proceedings have been initiated in the UK before January 1, 2021. While this opinion is in line with Article 67(2) of the Withdrawal Treaty applicable between the UK and the EU, it is doubtful whether it is valid under the Lugano Convention. In its assessment from May 2020 on the impact of Brexit on the Lugano Convention, the Federal Office of Justice supported the view that the Lugano Convention governs the recognition of judgments rendered in the UK after 2020, but in its April 2021 opinion mentioned above, the Federal Office of Justice left the question open.
Reading between the (few) lines in the Federal Tribunal&#8217;s decision, however, it is possible, as explained in the key take aways section above, to anticipate how the Federal Tribunal may approach the various possible fact patterns regarding judgments affected by Brexit.
In this regard, the decision of the District Court of Zurich dated February 24, 2021 – although not binding on other Swiss courts – is of particular interest. The District Court of Zurich held that the Lugano Convention does not apply in enforcement proceedings initiated after the Transition Period concerning a judgement of the English High Court issued during the Transition Period.
Hence, in practice, potential pitfalls remain for the time being. In order to avoid these pitfalls, it is necessary to analyze carefully the specifics of the case.

Fallout from Brexit on the Enforcement of UK Judgments

Fallout from Brexit Regarding the Enforcement of UK Judgments

Corporate / M&A

Capital Markets

Litigation

Competition

MCH Group

On December 22, 2020, MCH Group AG (MCH Group), a leading international live-marketing company with a comprehensive services network spanning the entire exhibition and event market, completed a recapitalization which improved its equity position by almost CHF 100 m, of which CHF 74.4 m cash proceeds out of a two-tranche capital increase and CHF 24.2 m by way of reduction of an outstanding loan from the Canton of Basel-Stadt.
The capital increases were underwritten by, among others, Lupa Systems LLC (Lupa), an independent private investment company controlled by James Murdoch as a new anchor shareholder. Following the completion of both capital increases, Lupa is expected to hold 32.32% of the shares in MCH Group, certain public sector shareholders will hold 33.34%, and the remaining public shareholders 34.34%.
In the context of the planned recapitalization, MCH Group settled all outstanding legal matters with LLB Swiss Investment AG, AMG Vermögensberatung and Erhard Lee. The shareholders affiliated with Erhard Lee have withdrawn all pending lawsuits before civil courts and supervisory authorities, and have supported the capital raise as implemented.
Homburger AG acted as legal counsel to MCH on this series of transactions and legal cases. The Homburger team was led by partners Hansjürg Appenzeller and Daniel Daeniker, and included lead associate Stefan Blunschi, associates Angela Oppliger and Anna Peter, and junior associates Daniel Madani, Cédric Berger and Oriana Schöni (all Corporate / M&amp;A, Capital Markets) as well as partner Roman Baechler and associate Simon Bachmann (both Litigation), partner Stefan Oesterhelt and associate Marc Vogelsang (both Tax), and partner Richard Stäuber (Competition).

Homburger advised MCH Group AG on a comprehensive recapitalization and settlement of outstanding legal matters

Employment and Executive Compensation

IP / IT

Financial Market Regulation

Credit Suisse

On August 25, 2020, Credit Suisse announced its plan to merge the business of its wholly-owned subsidiary, Neue Aargauer Bank AG (NAB), with that of Credit Suisse (Switzerland) Ltd., NAB&#8217;s direct parent company. NAB is a universal bank in the Canton of Aargau and approximately CHF 19 bn of assets under management as well as a mortgage volume of CHF 19.1 bn (as of December 31, 2019).
The Homburger Team is led by partners Dieter Gericke (Corporate / M&amp;A) and Benjamin Leisinger (Financial Market Regulation). René Bösch (Financial Market Regulation) acted as Senior Relationship Partner. The team further comprises partners Balz Gross (Employment and Executive Compensation), Dieter Grünblatt (Tax), Luca Dal Molin (IP / IT) as well as associates Daniel Häusermann, Angela Oppliger and Francesco Bernasconi (all Corporate / M&amp;A), Pierina Janett-Seiler (Financial Market Regulation), Laetitia Fracheboud (Tax) and Simon Bachmann (Employment and Executive Compensation).

Homburger advises Credit Suisse on the envisaged merger with Neue Aargauer Bank

Restructuring / Insolvency

Financing and Investment Products

Swissport

On August 31, 2020, Swissport International AG (SPI) announced that SPI together with certain other entities of the Swissport group (Swissport) entered into a lock-up agreement for comprehensive restructuring which envisages debt-for-equity swap with approx. EUR 1.9 bn of existing debt converted into equity or extinguished and EUR 500 m in new long-term facility. Swissport also entered into binding documentation for a EUR 300 m super senior interim facility. This additional financing provides Swissport with liquidity to trade through the COVID-19 pandemic and to facilitate the restructuring process. Under the terms of the lock-up agreement, Swissport will shortly be launching an M&amp;A process to run in parallel with other restructuring steps as customary in such situations. The financial restructuring is expected to be completed in late 2020.
Swissport is world&#8217;s leader in airport ground services and air cargo handling, with 64,000 employees, achieved consolidated operating revenue of EUR 3.13 bn in 2019. At the end of December 2019, Swissport was active at 300 airports in 47 countries on six continents.
Homburger advises SPI in connection with the restructuring as to Swiss law. The Homburger team is led by partners Claude Lambert (Corporate / M&amp;A) and Stefan Kramer (Financing and Investment Products; Restructuring / Insolvency) and includes senior counsels Ueli Huber (Restructuring / Insolvency) and Georg Naegeli (Litigation; Restructuring / Insolvency), associates Marco Rostetter, Daniel Kuhn, Aron Waltuch and Nina Hagmann (all Corporate / M&amp;A; Restructuring / Insolvency), Miguel Sogo (Litigation; Restructuring / Insolvency) and Simon Bachmann (Litigation) as well as junior associates Lars Göldi (Financing and Investment Products) and Vincent Croisier (Corporate / M&amp;A).

Homburger advises Swissport International AG on its comprehensive restructuring with creditors and shareholders including a debt-for-equity swap and a new 500 m euros long-term debt facility

Simon
Bachmann

Homburger advised MCH Group AG on a comprehensive recapitalization and settlement of outstanding legal matters

Homburger advises Credit Suisse on the envisaged merger with Neue Aargauer Bank

Homburger advises Swissport International AG on its comprehensive restructuring with creditors and shareholders including a debt-for-equity swap and a new 500 m euros long-term debt facility

Fallout from Brexit Regarding the Enforcement of UK Judgments

The Impact of Third-Party Funding on Security for Costs Requests in International Arbitration Proceedings in Switzerland: Why and how third-party funding should be considered under the Swiss lex arbitri

Join the Team

Simon Bachmann

Career

Languages

Bar Registration

Teams

SimonBachmann

Homburger advised MCH Group AG on a comprehensive recapitalization and settlement of outstanding legal matters

Homburger advises Credit Suisse on the envisaged merger with Neue Aargauer Bank

Homburger advises Swissport International AG on its comprehensive restructuring with creditors and shareholders including a debt-for-equity swap and a new 500 m euros long-term debt facility

Fallout from Brexit Regarding the Enforcement of UK Judgments

The Impact of Third-Party Funding on Security for Costs Requests in International Arbitration Proceedings in Switzerland: Why and how third-party funding should be considered under the Swiss lex arbitri

Join the Team

Simon Bachmann

Career

Languages

Bar Registration

Teams

Simon
Bachmann